Skip to content

Shutting up, sitting down, making peace

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

When you were a kid, and you found out about the Nazis, did you fantasize that, if you  had been there, you would have been really heroic? Hiding Anne Frank in your attic, that sort of thing? I know I did. Most of us did. I was a baby evangelical and we liked to think of ourselves as true warriors on the side of good, utterly fearless in our commitment to do what was right, no matter the consequences, because we knew our reward in heaven was assured. We knew that we would never let that sort of thing happen in America. We would stand up to evil. We would be strong.

Something like 85 percent of white evangelicals voted for Donald Trump for president.

Baby me was dangerously naive.

And I realized, yesterday, that I actually have no fracking clue how to prevent it. I have no idea how you stop a Hitler or a Nazis or a World War II when it’s still at this stage — when the Nazis are a troubling political party and Hitler is a disturbing Chancellor, but nobody’s fired up the genocide ovens yet.

Because until that happens, everybody thinks you’re a kook for being worried that it will happen.

Everybody tells you, “Calm down. It’s going to be all right.” They don’t explain how.

Everybody tells you, “Your side lost according to the established rules, just accept it.” They tell you to simmer down, shut up, forgive, move on. They tell you, “stop calling the other side racists, you’re being very insensitive, they voted for the man who talked about building walls and kicking out everyone who isn’t a proper sort of American because of their economic distress.”

I’m sure they did. You know what I was always told, in school? I was told that the number one reason for the Nazi’s rise to power was the economic distress during the Weimar Republic. Germany’s economy was dismal, in part because of sanctions imposed by the rest of the Europe after Germany was defeated during World War I. People were suffering. They had no hope. No way out.

Economic suffering. Then nihilism. Then Nazis.

If the United States hesitated to go to war against the Nazis because they insisted that we all had to be really empathetic about the terrible German economy during the Weimar Republic, I missed that part of it. We defeated the Nazis first, then we helped fix the German economy.

Pop culture is full of stories of people stopping Hitler through assassination. People with psychic visions and time machines prevent the Holocaust by firing one bullet into one man at the right time. But here in the world without a time machine, you can’t do it. Until it’s far too late, you’ll never know if you’re killing Hitler, or killing the man real Hitler will turn into a martyr. You could provoke the war by trying to prevent it.

Did you ever see one of those newsreels of Hitler, flickering black and white footage of an odd looking little man with an absurd mustache, shouting in German and thumping the podium in front of enormous, adoring crowds? Did you wonder what they saw in him? Because to you he looked ridiculous? Did you have a hard time imagining what made him appealing?

Did you ever look at footage from a Donald Trump rally and have the same thought?

I just looked it up. Hitler lost the 1932 presidential election to Paul von Hindenburg. But after two federal elections left the Nazis as the largest party in the Reichstag, Hindenburg felt pressured to appoint Hitler as Chancellor in 1933.

Mr. Trump lost the popular vote in this country. Most people who voted, voted for his opponent, Hillary Clinton. So in one respect he lost. However, because of the somewhat arcane voting rules of our Republic, Mr. Trump is appointed the victor.

Since Tuesday, there have been massive protests in most of the major cities across the country. Cities did not vote for Mr. Trump. Cities, we are told, don’t matter. They’re full of liberal elitists and cultural decadents whose biggest mistake is displaying scorn toward the real Americans, the Americans of the heartland, the ones who voted for Mr. Trump.

If only we had been nicer to them, we’re told, perhaps they wouldn’t have felt it necessary to elect a fascist just to spite us.

Since Tuesday, there have been a number of racist outbursts across the country. Many of these people, emboldened by the election of a president who sold himself using racist, anti-Semitic, and xenophobic language, are openly declaring themselves to be Nazis. The KKK is planning a big public celebration of the election results, like I’m sure they do every time a Republican is elected, except do you remember them throwing a big party for George W. Bush? Because I certainly don’t.

But we’re told these incidents are minor, or not even real. They shouldn’t be held to reflect badly on Mr. Trump or on the bulk of his voters, even though if Mr. Trump or the bulk of his voters have publicly denounced them, I missed that.

Because, of course, the real injustice here is those big protests. Those protests by dirty urban degenerates with their rap music and their gays and their birth control and they’re just sore losers and they should give up and move on and stop being so mean to the other side.

I have been asked, online, by someone I don’t know personally, in a tone of incredulity: are you really suggesting that most people who voted for Mr. Trump are racists? As if that’s an impossible thing to imagine and I’m a terrible small-minded person even for thinking it. People like me, with my urban liberal elitist degenerate scorn, are clearly still the problem.

Were most Germans in 1933 Nazis? No. Were most of them racists? Maybe not. Were most of them good people? Nice people? I’m sure they were. Most people are. Most of the time. About most things.

Except when they’re not.

We often make the mistake of assuming that human character is essential and fixed. That “being a racist” is a thing you are, rather than “acting like a racist” or “tolerating racism” or “encouraging racism” is a thing you do. I assume this is why people take such huffy umbrage when their racism is called out. They know “being a racist” is a bad thing to be, and therefore, assume you’re insulting them on some fixed essential characteristic. Then they try to suck you into a tone argument. It’s very important that you, the person making the accusation of racism, tiptoe around the tender delicate feelings of the person you have just insulted, because otherwise, you’re being a hypocrite, the real racist, destructive to the cause you purport to advance, etc. etc.

We — the liberal urban degenerates — have been told that we need to display more “empathy” toward the people who voted for Mr. Trump. For their economic distress and political dissatisfaction and so on. And certainly, I think we should repair their economy as we did for postwar Germany and Japan, except who’s “we” in this scenario? Weimar Germany suffered under austerity — but austerity in the form of low taxes/low services is what Republicans, Mr. Trump’s party, are promising to bring about.

To be strictly fair to Mr. Trump, he has promised to bring back all the good American jobs. Not that he has any compelling plan for how this is going to come about, mind you, but he has definitely promised to do it. In fact, a lot of his campaign rhetoric has sort of vaguely implied that these good American jobs are in the hands of foreigners, undocumented immigrants, nasty women, and other undesirables, and that by attacking them, we will get them to return these good American jobs that they have stolen.

There are some liberal urban degenerates who are certain in their hearts that if we had just offered them Democrat Bernie Sanders instead of Democrat Hillary Clinton, we could have had a man promising them good American jobs without also whipping up their racism and xenophobia, and would have won the day. But would they have believed it, coming from him? A Democrat? An urban liberal? A secular Jew? A socialist? Would they have believed it without all the racist demagoguery? Would “powerful men of big business just like Mr. Trump are the ones who stole your good American jobs” have resonated nearly as powerfully as “those OTHER people over there, the ones with a different skin color and strange customs, THEY took your good American jobs”?

Empathy means recognizing the basic humanity of other people, which means recognizing them as individuals with their own consciences and their own will who make their own decisions. Empathy doesn’t mean that people aren’t responsible for the decisions they make.

Using empathy, I try to imagine what it was like to be a good German person in 1933. What were they thinking? What were the good Germans all telling each other? It’s going to be all right? Don’t worry about the Nazis, they’re not really going to do all those terrible things they say?

Mr. Trump just used xenophobia and racism to win the election. He doesn’t reeaaaaaalllly mean it. Not deep down in his heart. His racism isn’t nearly as genuine and violent as it sounded.

Nobody knows what’s going to happen next. Maybe the Republicans in absolute power are going to simmer down and return to the same incompetent kleptocracy they had going during George W. Bush, which was terrible, but not Nazis terrible. Maybe there are good Republicans in Congress who are truly appalled by Mr. Trump’s racist demagoguery and will fight him if he tries to make good on any of his most troubling promises. Maybe there are Republicans in Congress who will  denounce racism, xenophobia, and the police state. Maybe there are Republicans committed to defending the first amendment to the Constitution and not merely the second. Maybe the principle of lash/backlash will work in our favor, as it did for Republicans under Obama, and in two years a Democratic Congress will be countering his every destructive move.

Maybe things really will turn out okay. Not the best, but okay.

I get the impulse to pretend everything is normal. I really do. Nobody wants to believe the world is broken. Nobody wants to believe that a significant portion of their fellow citizens are, deep down, as hate-filled and racist as it might appear. Nobody wants to look forward to the next four years and see nothing but unending civil strife. Nobody wants to be reminded every day of their dread and disappointment. They want to shop for Christmas presents. They want to feel good again.

Did Germans buy Christmas presents in 1934? Oh, look what I found when I Googled “Germany 1934 Christmas,” a Chicago Tribune from December 25, 1934, with the headline Nazis proclaim Hitler Europe’s Peace Champion.

“We Germans are celebrating the German resurrection this Christmas,” Rudolf Hess [..]

Hess assured his countrymen that “outer nations view Germany and her fuehrer with admiration and with certain envy.

“They do not always admit it — they try to hide their admiration behind lies and calumnies,” he said.

[..]

Hitler spent this afternoon in Munich with 1,000 of the oldest members of the Nazi party. After addressing them and ordering aids to distribute presents, he left for Berchtesgaden where he will enjoy Christmas in his Bavarian chalet. Munich painters have been supervising Christmas decorations. His Christmas tree will be decorated with small wooden figures designed and carved by artists.

The first snow of the season fell today. Theaters and restaurants throughout the nation are closed to emphasize the “festival of the family.”

I still don’t know how you stop Hitler the duly appointed Chancellor handing out presents in his Bavarian chalet from becoming Hitler, the monster who slaughtered millions. But I know this: it doesn’t come from worrying more about the sore feelings of people who think you’re calling them a bigot, than about the freedom, dignity, and safety of the people who are targets of bigotry. It doesn’t come from sitting down, shutting up, and pretending that everything is going to be okay.

If things turn out okay, it will be, in part, because we didn’t shut up.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Published inBlog

4 Comments

  1. Dorothy Westlund Dorothy Westlund

    Hi Julie;

    Your perceptive and eloquent writings are appreciated, as always. One thing that I’d like to add is just how powerful the “rip the baby” comment made during the last debate was to the conservative and evangelical factions. Many evangelicals depict Hillary as being akin to Dr. Mengele, believing that their choice of candidate was “the lesser of two evils”, as if Hillary is the one actually tearing healthy babies from pregnant mother’s wombs while loving, childless couples watch in horror. There is a complete and intentional misperception of the reasons behind late-term abortions, and how difficult these medical decisions are for the families involved, as if a pregnant woman would carry a fetus almost to term and then wantonly decide to let evil doctors (and evil politicians) murder their healthy child. Forbes has a worthwhile, post debate, article (http://www.forbes.com/sites/tarahaelle/2016/10/20/no-late-term-abortions-dont-rip-babies-out-of-wombs-but-they-are-needed/#1d3c56181bc4), but most evangelicals wouldn’t be swayed by or even read Forbes nor other scientifically based articles. However, they are swayed by religious tracks and by detailed descriptions of how painful the abortion process is for the murdered fetus. Many conservative organizations know the power of repetition, push button phrases, and rallying rhetoric such as “rip the baby”. A candidate who speaks with a fourth-grader’s vocabulary is easier to follow, and besides, he’s rich so he must know what he’s talking about, right?

    In the meantime, combatting bigotry, racism, prejudice, misogyny, and misinformation takes constant work.

    Thank you for your work.

  2. Jinx Jinx

    You are a fantastic blogger. (Or I’m egocentric because you are speaking what I’m thinking and feeling so much better than I ever could!)

    So many excellent points I could comment on, but I’ll stick to ‘we could have won if only we…’

    This need to rewrite history to get a different ending… I think most people would rather find a reason to blame him/herself for a ‘bad’ decision than to admit that he or she actually is powerless. Powerlessness is an amorphous and deeply terrifying feeling. Anger and guilt are so much easier to feel. Then the world makes sense and we feel in control.
    I’m not saying we should stop trying. But we need to admit that the racism is real and being more ‘respectful’ would not have changed that.

  3. Freddie Krueger Freddie Krueger

    One very plausible explanation as to why/how herr schicklgruber was able to mesmerize many of the dreadfully sane German people at the time is given in the book For Your Own Good by Alice Miller.
    In the context of America and the dreadfully sane people who voted for Trump a similar book by Philip Greven titled Spare The Child is necessary reading.
    Plus the book Between Jesus and the Market : The Emotions That Matter in Right-Wing America by Linda Kintz.

    Remember too that the Freddie Kruegers character appeared during the Reagan Years when the process of zombifying the USA populace really began, and when cutting up the future for children and all living-breathing-feeling beings began too.

    Freddie was Reagan’s very dark shadow.

Comments are closed.